Aug 26, 2024
This Boeing Failure Is DISASTER
NASA shunned Boeing's Starliner due to safety concerns to bring astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams home from the International Space Station.
- 10 minutes
Back in June, astronauts Butch Wilmore and
Suni Williams flew to the International
Space Station on Boeing's Starliner.
But now they'll fly home next February
in a SpaceX Crew Dragon,
despite Boeing's insistence
Starliner is safe to fly them back.
[00:00:15]
You know.
It's disappointing that that they're not
coming home on Starliner, but that's okay.
It's a test flight.
NASA spent weeks analyzing issues
Starliner developed on its flight
to the ISS, specifically helium leaks
and the overheating
of small maneuvering thrusters.
[00:00:32]
Bit of a disaster.
Now, two astronauts
who were supposed to be in space
for a mere eight days for a test flight,
will now be stuck in space until February,
thanks to safety concerns involving
that Boeing capsule used in the mission.
The Boeing Starliner.
[00:00:48]
Now, the AP reports that Butch Wilmore
and Suni Williams have been stuck at
the International Space Station since the
beginning of June, and again, they were
only supposed to be there for eight days.
Now they're going to be stuck there
until February.
So issues with the Boeing capsule include
thruster failures and helium leaks,
[00:01:08]
as you heard in that video, which marred
their trip to the space station,
they ended up in a holding pattern
as engineers conducted tests and debated
what to do about their flight back.
So as a result, the two of them will wait
[00:01:23]
for SpaceX's next taxi flight, and it's
due to launch in late September with two
astronauts instead of the usual four.
In order to make room for the two
astronauts who are now stranded
in the International Space Station.
Now, Starliner's troubles began
years before this test flight happened.
[00:01:42]
Bad software fouled the first test flight
without a crew back in 2019,
prompting a do over in 2022.
Then parachute and other issues
cropped up, including a helium leak
in the capsule's propellant system
that nixed a launch attempt in May.
[00:02:01]
That leak, or the leak eventually
was deemed to be isolated
and small enough to pose no concern,
but more leaks sprouted following liftoff
and five thrusters also failed.
Now, these 28 thrusters
are incredibly important because they keep
[00:02:17]
the capsule pointed in the right direction
at the flight's end.
As bigger engines kind of steer the craft
out of orbit, and so coming in crooked
could result in a complete and utter
disaster and could literally kill
the two astronauts in the capsule.
- Jake.
- Hey, don't scroll away.
[00:02:34]
Come back, come back.
Because before the video continues, we
just want to urge you to lend your support
to tweet you power our honest reporting.
You do it at tyt.com/team
and we love you for it.
Boeing's a mess so I can't know for sure.
[00:02:51]
None of us can, how risky it is for them
to come back on the Starliner.
We've got to trust NASA on it now.
Is NASA going to on the side of safety?
Yes, they are right.
So. And I'm sure that Boeing
is very frustrated by that.
[00:03:07]
I'm sure that Boeing thinks,
no, this you've got 28 thrusters.
Yes, five of them failed,
but four of them are back to working.
There's only one out of 28.
It's not a big enough issue.
We've analyzed this.
This is what Boeing is saying.
Analyze the risk.
And we think the risk is de minimis
and not worth delaying this for.
[00:03:25]
And having them stuck up there
for all that time.
But NASA's got to make the call
and I'm I'm not.
There's no way I can second guess them
or any of us can second guess them.
And by the way,
if they're leaning on the side of safety,
that's probably the right thing to do.
As one of our members, our guy pointed
out, Starliner is as safe as a 737 Max.
[00:03:44]
Right? Right.
Oh, wait. Exactly.
That's why I do not in any way
begrudge NASA for making this decision.
It is awful that these two astronauts
are going to be stuck for many months
in the International Space Station.
They won't be able to come home
until February.
But remember, Boeing has their own reasons
[00:04:04]
for why they do not want to switch
to a space capsule for the flight home.
I mean, they were hoping
that this whole mission
was going to help launder their image.
After all of the terrible incidents
that have arisen
have arised as a result of their planes.
[00:04:21]
So even AP news notes this.
They say Boeing had counted
on Starliner's first crew trip
to revive the troubled spacecraft program.
After years of delays
and ballooning costs, the company had
insisted Starliner was safe.
Based on all the recent thruster tests,
both in space and on the ground.
[00:04:38]
But you know,
they're taking a huge risk there.
Sure, they're going to say like,
no, no, I mean, five thrusters failed,
four of them are back online.
Everything's fine.
Only one of them is failing.
But if something goes wrong
and those two astronauts die, Boeing is.
- I don't know how they recover from that.
- Yeah.
[00:04:54]
And look, I was kind of again,
I'm a novice.
There's no way I could determine.
But I was kind of torn,
based on the reporting on whether the risk
was significant enough
that they shouldn't do it or not.
Right.
Because they it seems like they
have most of the issues under control,
not the one thruster.
[00:05:09]
And one other thing.
But then I read a portion of it
where they said, well, the other four
might have gone out because when they're
in a certain flight, area.
It might cause a swelling,
which then blocks other parts.
And I was like, no, that's it.
No, don't don't fly it.
[00:05:26]
Okay.
Because remember, guys, these,
space programs are very the shuttles, etc.
Are super.
I mean, it's a hilarious thing to say,
but super complicated.
Even the slightest little thing being off
and the whole thing blows up.
- Exactly.
- Yeah.
That's why I wouldn't take the risk.
[00:05:42]
And again, I do not begrudge NASA
for making this decision.
Now, this next video will have some
visuals to help you kind of understand
what the issues are.
So let's take a quick look at that.
That propulsion system
is critical to the return flight home,
[00:05:57]
including undocking and the braking burn
on the return to Earth.
The small engines need to fire hundreds
of times to keep the spacecraft in
the precise orientation for safe reentry
and on target touchdown instead,
Starliner will return uncrewed next month.
There was just too much.
[00:06:15]
Uncertainty
in the prediction of the thrusters.
It was just too much risk with the crew.
Yeah, I agree,
I do think it's too much risk.
I'm novice as well.
I'm not an expert on this,
but I just don't know
if I would take Boeing's word on it.
I wouldn't take Boeing's word
on anything at this point.
[00:06:32]
Yeah.
And so look, now the chance of it
blowing up on reentry is even higher
because pilots do a better job
of bringing it back in safely
without pilots, it might blow up.
And then oh my God,
it's an extra nightmare for Boeing.
[00:06:47]
Yeah, exactly.
I mean, they're taking such a huge risk
by urging the Boeing capsule
to be used to bring them back home.
I mean, again, if something goes wrong
and those two astronauts die,
you guys are done for, like, again,
I don't know how you recover from that.
That's true. But.
And remember, like, what I'm saying
is that without the astronauts,
[00:07:05]
the chance of it blowing up is higher.
- Oh, I see what you're saying.
- So then Boeing is going to be like.
But if we had the astronauts in there,
they might not have blown up.
But no one's going to care if it blows up.
Boeing's totally screwed.
Well, Boeing,
you guys got to clean your house.
Okay.
Like what's going on here? Seriously?
Because it's not just this one story.
This is not an isolated incident.
[00:07:23]
- You know, I have a theory on that.
- What's your theory?
That we're we're having a serious
competency problem in the United States.
Like serious competency problem?
Yes, but why is the question the question?
It's because there's no accountability.
So the Pentagon gets audited.
[00:07:40]
They never pass an audit.
They say we don't know
where half the money went.
And so we constantly funnel money
to these defense contractors.
Billions overall trillions at a time.
Right.
And and then we go I don't worry about it.
It's just just suck out all the money
from the American taxpayers wallets.
[00:07:58]
And remember, this is not really about
defense or space programs or any of that.
This is also we can get paid.
You guys are going to get trillions of
dollars, and then you're going to funnel
some of that to the former generals,
to the politicians, campaigns, etc.
We're all going to get rich.
So take a load off.
[00:08:14]
So and after a while, if there's no
accountability, you start making mistakes.
Yeah.
And remember, about a decade ago
NASA made a decision to enter these,
you know public private partnerships
which have their own issues, to be sure.
And what they wanted is to invite private
industry to compete with one another
[00:08:32]
for these government grants
in order to work with NASA.
And what's fascinating about this is
that Boeing got a much larger grant from
the federal government compared to SpaceX.
They received more than $4 billion
compared to SpaceX's $2.6 billion.
[00:08:48]
Yeah.
And so now they're showing
America credit where credit is due.
SpaceX is kicking their ass
and SpaceX is kicking ass overall
doing an unbelievable job.
So for all our issues with Elon Musk
on politics and how he runs Twitter X
[00:09:05]
and by the way, obviously the brother
is obsessed with the letter X. Okay.
Just recently on X spaces which is
different than X SpaceX or space X. Okay.
Let it go Elon.
Anyways, overall though,
it's weird, but it's true.
[00:09:23]
SpaceX is dominating
and so apparently you can run it well.
And so look this is if SpaceX continues
to do this well and they continue to take
business from them and they dominate here.
Score one for capitalism competition.
The better company wins out.
[00:09:41]
- Competition will start kicking in.
- Yeah.
Okay.
Then you know what's going to happen next.
Then SpaceX is going to get bloated.
They're going to be unaccountable.
There's going to be no competition.
And then they're going
to start blowing up.
That's right. That's the usual pattern.
- Yeah.
- It is important to have competition.
[00:09:57]
It is important to prevent, you know,
various industries
from monopolizing, you know.
Right now there are two major players
and it's Boeing and SpaceX.
I'm glad that SpaceX
is at least delivering.
Boeing needs to clean their house.
Figure it out.
Thanks for watching The Young Turks
really appreciate it.
Another way to show support
is through YouTube memberships.
[00:10:15]
You'll get to interact with us more.
There's live chat emojis, badges.
You've got emojis of me
Anna John Jr. So those are super fun.
But you also get playback
of our exclusive member only shows
and specials right after they air.
[00:10:31]
So all of that, all you got
to do is click that join button
right underneath the video.
Thank you.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
The Young Turks: August 26, 2024
Hosts: Cenk UygurAna Kasparian
- 17 minutes
- 14 minutes
- 14 minutes
- 9 minutes
- 15 minutes
- 10 minutes
- 12 minutes