Sep 30, 2024
Iraq War General Gives TERRIBLE Advice About Voting
Retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal argued that prioritizing policy when voting is a bad mood.
- 13 minutes
We don't elect a president
based on policies we shouldn't.
What?
On yesterday's installment
of Face the Nation, retired General
Stanley McChrystal, who has a background
that's very controversial,
[00:00:15]
made the stunning assertion that you
should not pick who you're going to vote
for for president based on policies.
And we have a lot more clips
where that came from now.
First, if you're not familiar
with McChrystal, Stanley McChrystal,
let me tell you a little bit about him,
and then we'll give you his statements
[00:00:32]
with more context.
Now, he was a high ranking member
of the military
during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He even served as the commanding officer
of all U.S.
And coalition forces in Afghanistan.
He was also highly involved
in the cover up of Pat Tillman's death.
[00:00:51]
He was in the military.
He died while serving, and it turns
out that he was killed by friendly fire.
And Stanley McChrystal
was recalled to D.C.
DC and resigned after a rolling Stone
piece exposed some negative comments
[00:01:06]
that he had for then Vice President Joe
Biden and other administration officials.
Which is interesting, right?
Because he was eventually
pushed out of his role because of his
criticisms toward Joe Biden.
And now he's advocating
that you vote for Joe Biden's VP
[00:01:23]
over Donald Trump not because of policy,
but because of something else.
So he elaborated on this a little more
in a Washington Post piece.
I'm sorry, a New York Times op ed.
I'm going to give you some pieces
from that in just a moment, but I actually
[00:01:39]
want to skip ahead to the video.
Let's go to the next clip
where he elaborates
on why you shouldn't focus on policy.
- You should focus on something else.
- You talk about character.
What is it about her character
versus former President Trump
that so convinced you
to take this public stand and endorse her?
[00:01:57]
I think character is what a person
does when they're under pressure.
It is a combination
of their deep seated beliefs, the things,
their core values and the discipline.
They have to execute those
to live up to them.
So I think when we look at Kamala Harris,
we look at her history.
[00:02:14]
She came up as a prosecutor,
an attorney general into the Senate.
She has lived a number of experiences
that I think build someone
the kind of character that's going
to be necessary in the presidency.
[00:02:30]
But let's be sure we don't elect
a president based on policies.
We shouldn't we should elect them
for the character because we don't know
what's going to come up.
We didn't know that one term,
Congressman Abraham Lincoln
was going to be able to lead
the United States through the Civil War.
[00:02:46]
So the argument here is policy doesn't
matter as much as character does.
Now, keep in mind that we can judge the
character of the two candidates because
they've both served in the white House.
Now, Donald Trump, of course, is president
and Kamala Harris as vice president.
[00:03:02]
So we have a little taste
of their character.
But I don't know.
Jake, am I crazy for thinking
that policy matters?
No, of course it matters.
Hey, don't scroll away.
Come back, come back.
Because before the video continues,
we just want to urge you
to lend your support to TYT.
[00:03:18]
You power our honest reporting.
You do it at tyt.com/team
and we love you for it.
So it's interesting because McChrystal
clearly disagrees with some of Kamala
Harris's policies overall, and that's why
he's trying really hard to avoid policy.
[00:03:35]
But at the same time, I don't think
that he's wrong about the character part.
Like, it doesn't mean
that you don't care about policy.
Of course you should care about policy,
but you should also care about character.
Because what does it mean?
I don't like unfortunately, a lot
of military guys use it as like honor
and go to war and support your fellow man
as we kill other people.
[00:03:54]
No no no no.
Honor means hey, do you support
the people that need you and and and are
honest and decent and moral.
Do you put the country
before you consider yourself
and especially of a good leader, right.
[00:04:11]
And not just if you're president,
but any leader?
Do you put the people that you're leading
ahead of your own interests,
and no one has ever failed that test
more spectacularly than Donald Trump.
He couldn't care less
about the people he leads.
He's a narcissist
and and is obsessed with himself.
[00:04:29]
And every single thing he does
is about me, me, me, me.
That's why he called people who were in
the military suckers and losers, because
he just he genuinely doesn't get it.
He does. He does not feel empathy.
He's a different kind of person.
There's a range that everybody is on the
empathy spectrum and he's at near zero.
[00:04:47]
So he's like, why would you go
and have honor and die for someone else
in a military context, when you could
just keep your life and and who cares
about other people defending them?
I'm just going to defend me.
So that's why he bothers a lot of guys
like McChrystal on that front.
Oh no.
Of course there are other factors as well.
[00:05:04]
Yeah.
Look, I first of all, I do wonder
what elections are going to look
like in this country when Donald Trump is
no longer the Republican candidate,
when some other Republican is running
against a typical Democratic candidate,
are they going to use
the same excuses about how no, no.
[00:05:22]
Who cares about how little
the Democrats are going to do for you?
The Democrats have better character,
so you must support the Democrats.
I just feel like there's been too
many election cycles now where Democrats
have skated by, by essentially telling us,
we're not going to do much for you.
[00:05:39]
Yeah.
Well, and we've talked
about this a million times.
There's good cop, bad cop.
So you're totally right.
On the other hand, hey, Republicans,
can you please stop nominating con men
lunatics because you give us no choice?
How the hell are we supposed to go in
that direction, if that's what you want?
[00:05:56]
And you think that you could
deliver that for people?
And remember, the Republican Party
is just a giant scam.
It's set up to help Rich people
and corporations.
- Unlike the.
- Democratic Party.
No, but that's
why I say good cop, bad cop.
The Republicans are the bad cop.
And then on top of that,
they give you crazy lunatics to vote for.
[00:06:12]
And it forces us into no choice at all.
And then they go,
oh, why don't you vote for our lunatic?
Oh, just because he doesn't care
about anybody else and is just running a
con on America and trying to rob us blind?
Yeah, yeah. That's why.
Yeah.
This election is just awful
in so many different ways.
[00:06:32]
Right?
Because Kamala Harris has
and the Democratic Party overall
has absorbed the nevertrump neocons.
Something I've said on this show time
and time again,
Stanley McChrystal is a perfect example
of the nevertrump neo cons.
Okay.
[00:06:47]
Which is why you hear Kamala Harris's
rhetoric be as hawkish as it is.
Okay, so there's that.
Her messaging has also kind
of shifted away
from appealing to working class issues
and instead focusing on what she can do
[00:07:03]
to help businesses in the United States.
You know what I'm saying?
She's positioning herself
as the so-called moderate,
which, you know, in Democratic politics
usually translates to Republican lite.
And so, look, I'm just being 100% honest
with you guys about where I am.
[00:07:20]
Okay.
And you can get upset about it
if you want to get upset about it.
I'm not impressed
by Kamala Harris right now.
Okay. And I can't stand that.
In election cycle after election cycle,
Democrats get to be super subpar
because the other guy has low character.
[00:07:38]
Yeah. But look.
So, okay, let me back up
a couple of things that Anna is saying,
but which then continues to leave us
in a in a spot that's hard to get out of.
I do have a solution, of course.
As always, we try to be constructive,
but on character is it really great
character for all the other politicians?
[00:07:53]
Well, 90% of them at least, who tell you
one thing and then do the other, who tell
you that they're going to look out for
you, but then look out for their donors.
I don't find it
that much better character.
Yeah, I get it.
Trump looks out for his donors
and himself, so he's worse.
But hey, I'm not looking out
exclusively for myself.
[00:08:09]
I'm mainly looking to help all my
donors is not a great selling line
on why you have great character.
And that's all of the corporate Democrats
and the corporate Republicans.
So and then on this neocon issue, we
have a tweet here, basically from Jeremy
[00:08:25]
Scahill, who's covered a lot of wars
and is a really great progressive writer.
And he said, if you're an American neocon
watching Biden and Harris
facilitating Israel's wars, which the
neocons have wanted forever, then
Harris is a solid candidate to support.
Let's start with this.
[00:08:41]
Neocons should support Harris because they
want to save democracy from Trump.
Nonsense.
So look, I don't I agree with that 75%.
I don't think the neocons
are coming to the Democratic Party
just because they think the Democrats
are going to start more wars,
[00:08:57]
or because they think both parties
are going to start the wars that we want.
But Trump's super unstable,
so we prefer a stable person
who is wedded to the donors.
ET cetera. ET cetera.
And so I think it's both.
But I'm the reason I bring that up
is because you guys aren't wrong.
[00:09:14]
The neo cons have come
to the Democratic Party.
They have I hate it.
And the Democrats are, you know, saying
things that make the neo cons happy,
which I'm deeply worried about.
And in fact, I'll add one last thing.
Look, Donald Trump has promised bigger
wars and bigger mayhem than Kamala Harris.
[00:09:31]
He's, you know, maybe
even annexing the West Bank for Israel.
He says that, you know, Iran will,
you know, will attack them even more.
ET cetera. ET cetera.
But the military industrial complex,
when they lean towards Kamala Harris,
[00:09:46]
make me worry
that they know something we don't know.
Well, I mean, look,
I think in the case of the Middle East,
Donald Trump is going to carry out
what his donors pay him to carry out.
And Miriam Adelson paying him $90 million
in this election cycle
wasn't for no reason.
[00:10:02]
I mean, obviously, she did that
in order to get favors in return,
namely, the annexation of the West Bank.
But remember, military generals
despise Donald Trump
because there were a few areas in which he
wanted less war or wanted to pull troops
[00:10:17]
out of certain countries.
So pulling troops out of Afghanistan,
that the person who got
that into motion was Donald Trump.
And I remember at the time covering that
story with all these military generals,
furious at him for doing so.
[00:10:32]
You get what I'm saying?
So Donald Trump is more of a wild card,
whereas I do see the Democratic Party and
Kamala Harris as more stable in keeping
the military industrial complex going.
- Yeah, I hear you.
- But look back to McChrystal.
[00:10:48]
On the other hand, Biden did
actually withdraw from Afghanistan.
Now he's threatening much larger wars,
or Israel is threatening much larger wars
in the Middle East that he's backing.
But he did withdraw from Afghanistan,
and McChrystal was basically fired
by Biden and Obama.
And nevertheless,
he endorsed Biden last time around.
[00:11:05]
He's endorsing Kamala Harris this time
around because Donald Trump is unnerving.
So if you remember his even his
own commander in chief at the end had to
call other countries and say, don't worry,
we're not going to nuke you
because the military realized
[00:11:22]
what everyone in the room realizes when
they spend any time with Donald Trump.
He's a madman.
He could do anything at any time.
He's a loose cannon.
And if a loose cannon holds the power of
the nukes, we barely got him out of office
last time without him pressing the button.
[00:11:39]
Yeah.
I mean, look, they they can't
stand the military generals,
both retired and active,
hate Donald Trump's rhetoric on NATO.
In fact,
in the New York Times op ed
in which McChrystal endorsed Kamala Harris
and explained why he says about NATO
[00:11:57]
character will dictate whether we stand
by our NATO allies and against
Vladimir Putin's continued aggression.
Character will dictate whether we have a
commander in chief who honors and respects
the men and women who serve in uniform.
The NATO part of that was
a big giveaway for me
[00:12:13]
in regard to why he favors Kamala Harris.
But final thing that I want to go to
is one more clip in which McChrystal seems
to struggle in giving a response.
When asked specifically
why he's endorsing Kamala Harris.
Let's watch.
Presidency certainly tests,
and it can forge leadership over time.
[00:12:31]
But what convinces you now,
ahead of a possible presidency, that she's
ready, especially on national security
and foreign policy areas, you know?
Well, yeah.
What do we know about anyone
before they took a job like that,
young President Kennedy,
when he was elected, was a young senator.
[00:12:47]
He did pretty well.
He struggled first through the Bay
of pigs, then did pretty well
in the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Donald Trump had no background in it.
What we've seen from Kamala Harris
convinces me she has the strength.
She has the values to deal with
the uncertain crises that are inevitable.
[00:13:05]
All right, so McChrystal believes that
Kamala Harris will handle international
crises better than Donald Trump.
Any final words, Jake? Yeah.
Let me just say the things
that he left unsaid.
The reason why he's struggling with.
Hey, what do you like about her character,
what do you like about her policies, etc.
[00:13:22]
Is because basically what he's trying to
say without offending MAGA and offending
a lot of the troops who are MAGA is guys.
Trump's an obvious lunatic.
We already lived through this madman.
So that's why I'm supporting
Kamala Harris.
Not because I think
she's the greatest thing in the world,
[00:13:37]
but because the other guy is mentally
unbalanced and that I agree with him on.
Thanks for watching The Young Turks
really appreciate it.
Another way to show support
is through YouTube memberships.
You'll get to interact with us more.
There's live chat emojis, badges.
[00:13:52]
You've got emojis of me
Anna John Jr. So those are super fun.
But you also get playback
of our exclusive member only shows
and specials right after they air.
So all of that, all you got
to do is click that join button
right underneath the video.
[00:14:08]
Thank you.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
The Young Turks: September 30, 2024
Hosts: Cenk UygurAna Kasparian
- 17 minutes
- 14 minutes
- 15 minutes
- 8 minutes
- 7 minutes
- 13 minutes
- 11 minutes
- 7 minutes
- 7 minutes