Oct 22, 2024
Journalists Argue The U.S. Is Swinging To The RIGHT
Vox writer Andrew Prokop gave examples on how America's pendulum is moving to the right.
- 18 minutes
The pendulum is swinging
to the right in America.
At least, that's what Andrew Prokop
argues in a new piece for Vox.
But so does Dave Weigel
in a piece that he wrote for Semafor.
And I think that they
actually do have a point.
So the Vox piece that I'm talking about
is titled The Big Political Shift
[00:00:18]
that explains the 2024 election.
Progressives felt they were gaining.
Now they're on the defensive.
So he's careful to note
that there have been some gains by
progressives in recent years that remain.
They have not been reversed.
[00:00:33]
Not it's not as if progressives gains
over the past 20 years or so
have been entirely wiped away.
The Democratic Party remains significantly
further to the left than it was a decade
ago, and certainly two decades ago.
And he does provide good examples
for what he's talking about here.
[00:00:51]
You know, he talks about the fact that,
you know, we have legalized gay marriage,
for instance,
some of the at least lip service that
you'll hear from Democratic politicians
in regard to what we need to do
about the environment, is certainly more
left than what we had ten years ago.
[00:01:07]
But he also provides examples
for why he believes that progressives
have lost influence in American politics.
He talks about the members
of the progressive squad who have either
acquiesced to the mainstream Democratic
Party or they lost in the primaries.
[00:01:25]
So Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman
are two examples.
He also mentions the progressive
prosecutors who have either been recalled
or voted out of office.
Pamela Price, for instance, in Oakland,
is currently facing a recall.
San Francisco's
former Da Chesa Boudin was recalled.
[00:01:41]
Los Angeles District Attorney George
Gascon is poised to lose his reelection
bid to a tough on crime district attorney
by the name of Nathan Hochman,
and in a piece written by Dave
Weigel for Semafor, he notes some
really interesting polling data
that I actually hadn't come across.
[00:02:00]
So he writes that in the summer of 2020,
for instance, Gallup had found
that 34% of Americans actually
wanted an increase to immigration.
So think about it.
It's the summer of 2020.
This is like right
in the beginning of Covid, really.
[00:02:16]
And you have 34% of Americans wanting an
increase in immigration, which, believe it
or not, that was the highest recorded
percentage of Americans wanting that.
And only 28% wanted a decrease
in immigration.
But let's fast forward
to June of this year.
[00:02:33]
Gallup found that only 16% of Americans
wanted higher immigration levels,
while a whopping 55% wanted a decrease,
which is the highest share
for that position since the weeks after
nine over 11. And in June of 2020, 47%
of Americans said that they were satisfied
[00:02:52]
with federal anti-crime policies.
But this summer only 28% of people
agreed with that sentiment.
69% of participants in this survey said
that they were dissatisfied.
And so you see it in the polling.
You also see it in the way
the Democratic nominee, Kamala Harris,
[00:03:11]
is basically running her campaign.
Politicians who studiously cultivated
left activists are now increasingly
tacking to the center,
most notably Vice President Kamala Harris,
who has abandoned many of the positions
she took while running in
[00:03:27]
the Democrats 2020 presidential primary.
And further, Weigel writes that
the Democratic Party, after two decades
of leftward post-clinton drift,
has jerked abruptly right facing Donald
Trump for the third consecutive election.
Democrats are making rhetorical
and policy concessions they didn't want to
[00:03:47]
or think they needed to.
In 2016 and 2020,
they've adjusted to an electorate
that shifted to the right toward the Trump
led GOP on issues that progressives
once hoped were non-negotiable.
Immigrant rights, LGBTQ rights,
climate change policies,
[00:04:04]
and criminal justice reform.
So there's more details to share with you
all on this, but I think you get
the general point about the thesis here.
And I actually think that it's correct.
I mean, you see it, the proof is
in the pudding and how it tastes.
[00:04:21]
And Kamala Harris certainly is running
as a moderate,
whereas in 2020 that was not the case.
Yeah. So it's definitely correct.
And it shows you a really important view
in American politics.
But it also has two giant caveats
that I want to put on it.
So first how it's correct.
So guys look at look at politics, right.
[00:04:40]
So you know that Kamala Harris said
that she was not going to take
corporate PAC money in 2019 and 2020.
Now she's bragging about raising $1
billion mainly off of corporate PAC money.
You know that she was,
for all of these positions
that are now seem enormously extreme,
[00:04:56]
like free gender change surgery for
undocumented immigrants who are detained.
And look, even if you're in favor of that,
you've got to recognize that is really
[00:05:11]
far out there on the political spectrum.
Okay.
If you don't recognize
that you're in a bubble, you're about max,
5% of the country agrees with that policy.
Okay.
So now all of a sudden she doesn't
care about any of that stuff.
[00:05:27]
Oh, she said that she
was for Medicare for all.
Now she's not for anything
in relation to health care other than, oh,
we'll continue, you know, negotiating one
drug price per year for the rest of time,
leaving tens of thousands, etc..
But no, Medicare for all is gone.
Universal healthcare is gone.
[00:05:43]
Public option is gone. Everything is gone.
Right?
So it's the same person and she had this
massive shift in opinion and ideology.
No. They're politicians.
So before she thought that was hot.
[00:05:59]
Now she thinks this is hot. And so.
And why do they think this is hot now?
Because they tried half of that.
And that's going to get to the caveats.
They tried half of those policies
the absolute worst half.
And it didn't work.
And the American people didn't like it.
[00:06:15]
So then they were like, okay, panic,
we're switching now and we're going to be
right wingers and that we're going to take
the Democratic Party to the right.
Okay.
But what do we mean by right and left?
- So that's the first caveat.
- So it's always on social issues always.
[00:06:30]
And so this brother here on Vox
writes a good interesting article.
But like almost every other smart pundit
that's writing interesting articles,
they still miss the big picture
on those two giant caveats.
So the first one is which part
of progressivism are you talking about,
[00:06:47]
the social stuff or the economic stuff?
Because if you're talking about the
social stuff, I get what you're saying.
You're totally right.
Look at the polling,
whether we agree or disagree.
And actually, I've agreed that
that we shouldn't be doing
those policies from day one.
That's part of why the left, some portions
of the extreme left hate us because we
[00:07:04]
were never on board for that stuff.
Like, I remember
when the extreme left said,
let's decriminalize border crossings.
And I was like, no, no, no,
no, no, no, I'm an immigrant.
I want I'm a first generation immigrant.
I want to protect immigrants.
I don't want any of these demagoguing
and I want a fair system, etc.
But you can't decriminalize border
crossings that will have 3 billion people
[00:07:22]
in the country by the end of the week.
That means you don't have a border.
That means you don't have a border.
That's nuts.
You can't do that.
It's not practical.
It just doesn't make any sense.
Have you ever thought
that issue through at all?
Have you given it
like one second of thought?
So we at the Young Turks,
we were never for that.
[00:07:38]
And we drove the left crazy on that stuff.
Why?
Because we're like. It doesn't make sense.
It's not. That's not progressive to go.
Oh, are no borders, no prisons, no cops,
no reform the police because
they're beating people up, etc., etc.
So on the social issues, they go, okay,
that's progressive, but how about that?
[00:07:56]
And that's unpopular. Fair.
How about the economic issues?
- Yeah.
- How about the economic issues?
Enormously popular.
The progressive policies
on the on economic issues.
All poll above two thirds Medicare
for all, higher wages, paid family leave.
[00:08:12]
You can't name an economic issue where
progressives don't pull through the roof.
But even smart pundits
are like no progressive bad.
They're all in the same group.
Lump them together.
I hate them all.
That's why corporations should win.
You should live under corporate rule,
and you should never do any of
[00:08:29]
the economic suggestions of progressives.
I want to go.
I disagree. There's a second giant caveat.
So I want to give you an excerpt
from the piece.
Let's go to graphic six
because he fleshes it out even more,
saying that Democrats in cities
disavowed police cuts as they struggled
[00:08:46]
with rising crime and complained
they couldn't handle a migrant influx.
Let's just pause.
Come back to me because a lot
of people get upset at the messenger,
but all you have to do is just
live in real life to understand
that when people start getting victimized
[00:09:02]
by some of the I'll just be generous
and say unintended consequences
of these poorly implemented policies,
like what I've seen from the
Democratic Party is a denial that those
negative consequences are even happening.
You can deny it all you want, and you
can gaslight about it all you want,
[00:09:19]
but the people who are impacted by it
know it's happening,
so you can't brush it under the rug
because people are
actually experiencing it.
And when they experience it
and get gaslit about it,
on top of that, they get real mad.
Okay.
Go talk to Democrats.
I'm not talking about Republicans.
[00:09:37]
Go talk to Democrats in L.A., San
Francisco, Portland, Seattle, New York.
Okay.
And what you will get is wall
to wall people going,
why did we decriminalize sexual assault?
What the what?
Who? Who said yes to that?
And the answer is no one said yes to that
except some weirdo extreme leftists
[00:09:54]
who hijacked the agenda.
And instead of giving everybody
health care and paid family leave,
they're like, we got a great idea.
Let's decriminalize a whole bunch
of things that people absolutely hate, and
it'll scare the living crap out of them.
So they'll never vote
for a progressive again.
And so, look, my frustration is
like when an election happens,
[00:10:15]
the candidate who wins
has political capital in the beginning.
Right.
And at some point, progressives
certainly had some political capital.
We had some sway and some influence
over the Democratic Party.
And I'm upset that I feel like
[00:10:31]
that opportunity was squandered because
that opportunity could have been utilized
to implement universal economic policies
or real reforms to our health care system.
If we had just actually focused
on those things,
avoided infighting about garbage nonsense,
[00:10:49]
and ensured that that was the focus,
that's what we would accomplish
and that would have improved
so many people's lives.
And now it's over.
Guys like no one in this election, no one
is talking about improving health care.
You're right Jake.
Every time anything related to health
care comes up, Kamala Harris will be like,
[00:11:06]
oh, we did some wonderful things.
We capped the price of insulin.
Okay, great. I'm glad you did that.
But that doesn't fix
our health care system.
Our health care system is broken.
There's still tens of millions
of Americans who have no health insurance
whatsoever, no coverage whatsoever.
These are real problems that impact
a lot of people, including, if not more
[00:11:26]
marginalized people in this country.
Yeah.
So I want to correct something I said
because I just said it as I was talking.
Pass. Decriminalize sexual assault.
No one did that.
But what they did do,
for example, in California.
And there's a ballot measure now
to reverse it is that they moved
[00:11:41]
some serious felonies,
like sexual assault to misdemeanors,
depending on the kind of sexual assault.
Right.
And so and you read that list of stuff
that they moved down to misdemeanors
and you're like.
- Why did they do that?
- Why why did we do that?
How does that have anything to do
with police beating up
[00:11:59]
and shooting black guys like that?
Why would a guy abusing his wife
have anything to do
with the police reform that we wanted?
And in fact, in that ballot measure
in California, they literally hid it.
They did not say in the ballot measure
what they were doing at all in moving
them, which crimes they were moving, etc.
[00:12:16]
It was the most deceptive ballot measure,
maybe in American history.
And that makes me go, wait, what is this?
Is this some sort of weirdo
false flag operation?
I don't think it is.
But if I was a right winger who wanted to
destroy the idea of economically populist
[00:12:32]
progressive proposals,
I would take the crappiest
progressive Proposal and make it
even crappier and hide it from people
and then have it pass and then go.
You see, progressives stand for out of
control crime and sexual assault.
You see that?
I mean, you know, if they weren't,
if they weren't a right wing plant,
[00:12:51]
they were so horrifically incompetent that
they could have been that it's plausible
that they were a right wing plant.
We don't even know.
We don't even need
to go to the right wing.
Okay.
Because what what did neoliberal Gavin
Newsom actually accomplish?
[00:13:07]
What did he fight against
the hardest in this state?
Two things.
He fought against increasing
the minimum wage for all workers.
And he fought against Medicare
for all system in the state.
Those are the two things
he fought aggressively against.
But that neoliberal was very happy
to implement the other policies
[00:13:27]
that we're talking about.
- That's a great point.
- Okay.
- Because that disempowered progressivism.
- So what?
So first of all,
vote for prop 32 in California.
If you live in California, that's
the increase, the minimum wage and 36.
You know why it's a ballot measure?
Because Gavin Newsom said,
hell no, I'm not going to raise wages.
[00:13:43]
You're going to have to put that
on the ballot and go around me because all
my donors say, don't raise wages,
don't do anything about health care.
By the way, another thing is
don't bury the the phone lines
that cause all the fires,
because that would cost one of my top.
In fact, my top donor, that's Gavin Newsom
gave him PG and E gave him $10 million.
[00:14:01]
That would cost them money.
So I'd rather have your towns burn down.
Exactly.
But but the one progressive thing I'll do
is release all the criminals.
Yeah. Shut down four prisons.
Okay?
With no plan, no investments
in rehabilitation whatsoever.
[00:14:16]
County prisons end up getting overcrowded.
I mean, it's just a complete nightmare.
And so can you understand why voters would
be upset and why voters would go from
being open minded to progressivism to now
being distrustful toward progressivism?
Yeah. Of course.
[00:14:32]
And so that one Now the second caveat
for me which to this article
otherwise good articles,
both of them write, making a good point
about how this giant shift back
to the right for the Democratic Party.
But is it right and left?
We talked about the policies
and broke that down for you.
[00:14:49]
But remember, I'm sorry if I keep
repeating it, but it's not that simple.
It's populist versus establishment.
So when you look at it from that lens,
the Democratic Party hasn't moved
to the right as much as they've moved back
to the establishment.
And so when you jettison the economically
populist plans of the progressives
[00:15:09]
in that lurch to the right, you become
less populist and hence less popular,
and so that it's the inability to discern
between economic and and social issues
when it comes to progressives.
[00:15:27]
It shows, unfortunately,
a massive Ignorance in how politics
is analyzed in this country.
I've got to give you these stats
because they're so amazing.
Mike Lux,
has a group that did this polling.
He's a good progressive.
[00:15:43]
Sometimes I get frustrated
because these days he's so rah rah
and Kamala Harris and, and and that's
because he's an old school Democrat, etc..
But he did a poll that shows
you exactly what is correct.
Okay.
So when they asked Americans,
67% of voters agree that, quote,
[00:16:00]
one of the biggest problems facing America
today is that a handful of corporations
have too much power and government is
doing too little to hold them accountable.
Let's not do anything about that.
So two thirds of Americans say go left,
go populist on economic issues
[00:16:17]
and fighting corporate rule.
Half of them,
49% of them say that strongly,
usually, strongly is a tiny category.
But half the country is going
where you regulate corporations already.
And Democrats are like,
we're going further towards corporations.
Kamala Harris released a letter of 90 CEOs
saying she's the best of the best.
[00:16:35]
Today, there's a story out
about how Jamie Dimon might become
the treasury secretary for Kamala Harris.
What are you doing? Look at the numbers.
What is wrong with you?
Don't you have eyes?
Here, let me read you two more.
71% of voters.
That's a monster number.
[00:16:51]
Agree that today, quote, today, a handful
of enormous, economically powerful
corporations wield a massive amount of
influence over the quality of our lives,
with almost no accountability
or transparency to the public.
Look at the phrasing.
It's the phrasing sounds extreme
and still 71% go, that's right.
[00:17:11]
They have no accountability.
They should be totally regulated.
Last one, 76% of voters
over three quarters of Americans
agree that, quote, today,
a handful of enormous monopoly
corporations wield a massive amount of
[00:17:28]
influence over the quality of our lives,
with almost no accountability
or transparency to the public.
The country is massively
economically populist.
And on those issues,
on economic issues, massively progressive
[00:17:45]
three quarters of the country.
But not one reporter in America can
figure out, oh, progressive social issues,
culture war nonsense versus progressive
economic issues that the country loves.
[00:18:00]
Thanks for watching The Young Turks
really appreciate it.
Another way to show support
is through YouTube memberships.
You'll get to interact with us more.
There's live chat emojis, badges.
You've got emojis of me
Anna John Jr. So those are super fun.
But you also get playback
of our exclusive member only shows
[00:18:20]
and specials right after they air.
So all of that, all you got
to do is click that join button
right underneath the video.
Thank you.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
The Young Turks: October 22, 2024
Hosts: Cenk UygurAna Kasparian
- 25 minutes
- 18 minutes
- 18 minutes
- 8 minutes
- 7 minutes
- 9 minutes