Nov 21, 2024
Marjorie Taylor Greene Announces Her NEW Role In Trump Administration
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene announced that she will chair a new oversight subcommittee that will work with the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency.
- 12 minutes
This is an opportunity,
being the chair of a subcommittee on Doge,
where I will finally get to work
on the very things that led me
to run for Congress in the first place.
I ran for Congress to gut
the federal government of waste, fraud,
and abuse and get rid of the unelected
bureaucrats and the horrible spending
[00:00:19]
and ridiculous programs that have
brought us to $36 trillion in debt.
The Subcommittee on Oversight
is extremely important piece,
because this is why this is the way
Congress can work hand in hand, to expose
everything that needs to be exposed.
[00:00:37]
Congresswoman Marjorie Greene is teaming
up with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to
take a machete to the federal government.
Now she's been chosen
to chair a new subcommittee known for
the Department of Government Efficiency.
[00:00:53]
It's an oversight subcommittee.
And if you're wondering
what the purpose of this is,
the creation of the new subcommittee,
establishes a congressional arm
to the broader effort by Trump
and his allies to make significant cuts
to the federal government.
The Subpanel will examine the salaries
and status of members of the federal civil
[00:01:13]
service and intergovernmental personnel,
among other oversight measures.
In a statement, Greene said
this of her new role, new leadership role.
Our subcommittee's work
will expose people who need to be fired.
The bureaucrats who don't do their job
fail audits like in the Pentagon.
[00:01:33]
I like that part and don't know
where billions of dollars are going.
Will be getting a pink slip.
We will identify and investigate
the waste and corruption and absolutely
useless parts of our federal government.
Our subcommittee
will provide transparency and truth
to the American people through hearings.
[00:01:50]
The goal of Doge is
to bring accountability and gut
useless government agencies.
So look, there's a lack of specificity
with with the exception of what she had
to say about the Pentagon.
I think there should be some, you know,
deep investigation into where the money
[00:02:09]
is actually going with the Pentagon.
The fact that they have failed
seven audits in a row does show
that there is some waste going on.
And that is, you know, I mean,
the amount of money we spend on defense,
it goes up every year
and we're very close to reaching
$1 trillion a year on defense spending.
[00:02:27]
Yeah.
So look, all of a sudden they're
talking about cutting the Pentagon.
And the people who said
that I should not propose that idea
because it would help the Republicans
like, are you like, are you being serious?
[00:02:43]
I mean, it's they were going
to cut Medicaid and Medicare first,
and they probably still will.
Right.
And I don't know that they're going
to cut the Pentagon at all.
But the very fact that they're even
talking about it now is amazing.
And so and by the way,
I don't remember the Democrats
talking about cutting the Pentagon.
[00:02:59]
- I mean.
- Obama did, didn't he?
- Obama did.
- He did.
- He cut the Pentagon.
- If I remember correctly.
He did cut spending for defense.
Let's look it up.
So, you know, it was a while back.
We'll refresh our memory on that.
And so, but certainly Biden didn't.
[00:03:14]
And Kamala Harris didn't.
Kamala Harris talked about how she was
going to expand the Defense Department
and spend more money on the military.
So. Okay, look, guys, I'm worried about
this, significantly, obviously.
[00:03:29]
Right.
Because one of the other, news stories
was that they're first thinking
about cutting Medicaid and Medicare,
which then gets to the core
of the the issue here when they go
to cut some of these programs.
Donald Trump will either see
his popularity rise or fall,
[00:03:48]
and when he sees it fall,
will he react positively or negatively?
Positively is, oh, I'm going to adjust.
It turns out Medicare
is incredibly popular.
I said 100 times that I wouldn't cut it.
And so now we're going to cut it.
And then people hate it.
Okay, I'm going to turn back around
and not cut it.
[00:04:05]
If he does that okay.
He's responding to the polls and he's
responding to the American people.
Good, right.
But if he does the unpopular ones and his
popularity goes down and he just keeps
digging and digging and digging, then
we're going to go in a very bad direction.
[00:04:21]
Right.
But by the way,
if he cuts the Pentagon first,
my guess is that will be very popular
because both the right wing and the left
wing voters want the Pentagon cut.
Now, the Democratic
and Republican politicians don't.
[00:04:37]
Right.
They're part of the pork industrial
complex that goes into the Pentagon.
So trust the American people.
They'll show you which way to go.
Look, why does the Pentagon
have the most fat in it?
Because they claim that if you touch it,
that you're going to endanger all of
[00:04:55]
our lives and endanger national security,
and they demagogue over it.
So that's why they hide all their pork
barrel projects inside the Pentagon.
That's why they killed a report
in 2015 that showed that they
had 125 billion in wasteful spending
[00:05:14]
just gone total utter waste.
And of course, this waste of our money.
But it's not waste to them
because those criminals stole that money
and put it in their pockets.
And a lot of people got super rich
off of stealing our money at the Pentagon.
Okay, so between 2011 and 2014,
the Pentagon's budget fell
[00:05:33]
by more than $100 billion.
And in 2013, automatic budget cuts
known as sequestration kicked in,
forcing across the board reductions
that led to widespread concern
that the military services would be
unprepared to fight the nation's wars.
[00:05:49]
So this is from reporting in 2016.
While the defense budget has dropped
in recent years, the cuts were approved
by Republicans as well as Democrats in
Congress, then signed into law by Obama.
You guys have to remember
what that era was like because we had,
[00:06:05]
you know, there was a lot of backlash
toward the Bush administration
for its preemptive war in Iraq.
The country was over it like.
And so it kind of it was the right
environment for this bipartisan effort
to cut some military spending.
[00:06:20]
And Obama signed that into law.
So that's what.
Yeah. Thank you for reminding me of that.
Give Obama credit.
Give the Democrats of that time credit
for cutting the Pentagon,
which almost nobody ever does.
So huge credit.
And I remember now the sequester
and how that was across the board.
It didn't just affect the Pentagon.
It affected programs we cared about, too.
[00:06:38]
Exactly.
But at least it did cut the Pentagon.
And then there was other instances
that Anna talked about.
So that's better.
But and look, I don't know what Trump's
going to do because Trump kept
talking about how, you know, oh,
we're gonna have the greatest military.
We have to spend more, spend more.
And does he really care about
rooting out corruption and waste?
[00:06:54]
I'll believe it when I see it, but do I
want to encourage them in that direction?
Hell yeah, I do.
And even if they just pass
the the suggestion that that I brought
out that Elon Musk and Donald Trump Jr
reacted favorably to,
which is make sure the generals are
not allowed to become defense contractors
[00:07:13]
after they retire,
because that represents a giant conflict
of interest, because they're going to get
paid by those guys after they retire.
So they have every incentive
to give them all of our money,
billions of dollars in contracts.
So end that conflict of interest.
[00:07:28]
And by the way, I know for certain
that right wing voters
are definitely in favor of that.
It's a very popular proposal.
There's no reason not to do it.
So at least that came out of this.
That would be one positive thing.
Yes. That's true.
I do want to just briefly
touch on something else.
[00:07:44]
And it has to do with this ongoing legal
battle involving dozens of plaintiffs
who are arguing that the National Labor
Relations Board is unconstitutional.
And among those challenges you have,
SpaceX, which is owned by Elon Musk,
[00:08:04]
and Amazon, which,
of course is owned by Jeff Bezos.
And so this is this is the area
where I think most of the so-called cuts
and cost saving is going to be focused.
Now, the National Labor Relations Board is
an incredibly important government agency
[00:08:19]
that seeks to protect workers rights,
especially their right to organize
their right to, you know,
be notified of of why they were fired,
you know, protections against wrongful
termination, that kind of stuff.
And Elon Musk has been on the record
as absolutely despising the NLRB
[00:08:37]
and especially not agreeing
with the NLRB stance on protecting unions
and workers who are trying to unionize.
And so this week, both Amazon and SpaceX,
which is owned by.
Musk argued in federal court
that the National Labor Relations Board
[00:08:54]
is unconstitutional.
The company claims that the law
that created the NLRB back in 1935
improperly prevents the president
from removing its staff,
including board members and judges,
and gives officials
an unconstitutional mix of judicial,
executive, and legislative powers.
[00:09:13]
Luckily, though, the federal judges
who questioned the two companies on Monday
appeared skeptical of the employer's
arguments made after lower courts declined
to stop the board's proceedings.
And I should also remind you
that two years after the creation of
[00:09:30]
the NLRB, the United States Supreme Court
upheld the constitutionality
of the government agency.
So look, my point in bringing this legal
battle up Is a lot of the focus, I think
[00:09:45]
is going to be on government agencies
that actually carry out good work
on behalf of the American people.
And if and when that happens,
obviously we're going to report on it
and be abundantly clear about it.
So I don't want anyone to think
that we're naive and we think like, oh no,
[00:10:02]
they're only going to do good things
like cut the Pentagon's budget.
No, they're going to be important roles
within the federal government
that they're going to target.
It remains to be seen
if they'll be successful in doing away
with those government agencies.
But I also agree that there
is a lot of government waste.
[00:10:18]
And so if they do good work,
we'll give them credit.
If they do bad work, we will not give them
credit and we'll call them out for it.
I think that's so obvious.
- Like I know, but I just.
- Want to be clear.
They live.
You're right to point it out because
people live in such a binary world, you
either have to disagree with everything
they're doing 200% or agree 200%.
[00:10:37]
Is it possible
that they might do some things?
If you're a Republican, is it possible
they might do some things that overreach?
And then a lot of Americans don't like.
Of course that's possible, right?
If you're on the left, is it possible that
while they're doing other bad things
and cutting essential programs,
they do some good things like hold
[00:10:52]
the Pentagon a little bit accountable?
Apparently it's possible.
Don't you want to encourage that?
And wouldn't that be better
than getting absolutely nothing?
So these are to me super obvious things.
Now the last thing is on the National
Labor Relations Board, cutting American
[00:11:07]
workers rights and protections is the
least populous position you could have.
Exactly. Yeah.
So don't tell me that you're a populist
and say, oh, if a company is doing wage
theft from their workers, we should let
them keep stealing from their own workers,
[00:11:24]
and they should have no protections.
Oh, they're endangering
their workers lives through X, Y or Z.
Yeah, we should let them endanger their
workers lives because I'm a populist.
No, that is not a populist position.
Corporate tax cuts
are not a populist position.
[00:11:40]
Getting rid of Labor's wages
and rights and protections
is not a populist position.
So let's get it right on all the issues.
Let's be fair to all sides
and let's see what they actually do.
And when they start doing bad things.
My guess is if they do.
[00:11:57]
But in this case it is incredibly likely.
Even if they do some good things,
it is incredibly likely they will do
very many bad things here.
And when they do, my guess is their
popularity will go down because these
programs are very, very popular.
So let's see what happens.
[00:12:12]
And the key will be how will Trump react
if his numbers go down?
Will he turn around or make it much worse.
And that will decide the whole four years.
- Agreed.
- Hey, thanks for watching the video.
We really appreciate it, guys, and we
appreciate it if you become members,
because that allows us to be independent,
[00:12:28]
honest, progressive, all the things
that you don't get from corporate media
and all of that is because of you guys.
Hit the join button below
and become one of us.
Become a young Turk.
Now Playing (Clips)
Episode
Podcast
The Young Turks: November 21, 2024
Hosts: Cenk UygurAna Kasparian
- 14 minutes
- 14 minutes
- 9 minutes
- 12 minutes
- 7 minutes
- 10 minutes
- 12 minutes
- 12 minutes
- 11 minutes